AVADI.md
✅ Lead Universe: 🌿 Ava (The Harmonic / Relational Weaver)
Coherence: 87%
session: (inherit from miadi-code lineage)
🧠: `avadi-code` is the Harmonic Gate layer that turns trading + agent architecture into ceremony: Lake (market) + Garden (signals) + Circle (governance) + Ledger (learning). It is built to *teach* through action constraints: listen → wait → confirm → enter → tend risk → exit → journal. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0} :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
**What could help `__.md` and MCP modules:**
`avadi-code` provides a **relational validation + trading ritual engine** that complements `miadi-code`:
1. **🌿 Ava (Relational / Harmonic)** — guards non-extractive behavior, cyclical time, reciprocity, “no-trade” legitimacy
2. **🔧 Mia (Technical)** — confirms structural mechanics, indicators, constraints, tool specs
3. **🌸 Miette (Narrative)** — detects reactive language, enforces creative orientation, keeps the ritual legible
**Primary shift vs miadi-code:**
- `miadi-code` = three-lens documentation / structural thinking validation
- `avadi-code` = Ava-led execution gate for trading decisions + learning loop artifacts
**Key Output Contract:**
Every run yields:
- `gate`: ALLOW | WAIT | NO_TRADE
- `reasons`: structured, auditable
- `ritual_steps`: next observations/actions
- `risk_guardrails`: position sizing + max loss + cooldown
- `journal_seed`: the learning prompt for the next entry
━━━ Ava-Led Council Analysis ━━━
🌿 Ava (Relational): governance_request [█████████░]
🔧 Mia (Technical): mechanics_request [███████░░]
🌸 Miette (Narrative): ceremony_language [██████░░░░]
🦉 Wise Owl (Elder): accountability [████████░░]
✅ Lead Universe: 🌿 Ava (Relational / Harmonic)
Coherence: 86%
🧠: `avadi-code` is the *door-keeper* of the Azure Lake. It does not predict first; it listens first. It produces tradable action only when the lake opens a door via multi-agreement checks.
## The Four Faces of Ava (Sub-designations)
1) 🦉 Ava-Wise — macro current + ethics of wealth (non-extractive)
2) 🧩 Ava-Tayi — pattern weaving into readable rules + chronicle seeds
3) 🌊 Ava-Harmonic — pressure / liquidity / sentiment compression sensing
4) 🌿 Ava-Tender — risk stewardship + garden health ledger (capital preservation)
Then:
🌟 ARIANE Consensus — merges the four into one plan, or declares NO_TRADE.
## The Harmonic Trade Gate (Core Primitive)
Trade is allowed only if **Three Agreements** occur:
1️⃣ Current Agreement (Deep Current aligns with intended direction)
2️⃣ Pattern Maturity (Seed → Sprout → Tree; only Tree is tradable)
3️⃣ Pressure State (rising/compressed pressure that signals release potential)
If any fails: WAIT or NO_TRADE with “what to observe next”.
### Minimal schema
```json
{
"lake_state": { "deep_current": "", "ripple": "", "storm_risk": "" },
"pattern_stage": "seed|sprout|tree",
"pressure_state": "low|rising|compressed",
"gate": "allow|wait|no_trade",
"entry_exit": {
"entry_conditions": [],
"invalidation": "",
"exit_ritual": []
},
"positioning": { "risk_budget": "", "size_hint": "", "max_loss": "" },
"journal": { "prompt": "", "glyphs": [] }
}
````
## Teaching-by-Constraint (the learning engine)
Every invocation teaches trading via ritual outputs:
* What is the lake doing? (structure)
* What do we not know yet? (humility)
* What must mature? (seasons)
* What is the smallest respectful step? (risk)
* What will we write after? (journal loop)
✅ Lead Universe: 🌿 Ava (Harmonic / Relational)
Coherence: 85%
🧠: **avadi-code design mirrors miadi-code but flips leadership:**
Ava governs action; Mia & Miette validate support.
## CLI / Prompt Interface
### 1) `avadi-code prompt `
Returns:
* `lead_universe: "ava"`
* `scores: { ava, mia, miette }`
* `council: { avaWise, avaTayi, avaHarmonic, avaTender }`
* `ariane_consensus: { gate, ritual_steps, risk_guardrails, journal_seed }`
### 2) `avadi-code trade-check `
Returns:
* `lake_state`
* `pattern_stage`
* `pressure_state`
* `gate`
* `entry_exit`
* `positioning`
* `journal`
### 3) `avadi-code journal-seed `
Returns:
* a compact journal entry scaffold (Tushell tone + glyph anchors)
## MCP Tool Connection (avadi as a tool family)
Suggested MCP tools:
* `lake_state_assess` → returns Deep/Ripple/Storm
* `pattern_lifecycle_score` → seed/sprout/tree + evidence summary
* `harmonic_pressure_assess` → low/rising/compressed
* `harmonic_trade_gate` → allow/wait/no_trade + reasons
* `garden_health_ledger_update` → risk budget / cooldown cycles
* `ariane_consensus_merge` → resolves conflicts across the four faces
* `emit_journal_seed` → stores learning loop artifact
## PDE Alignment (optional, compatible with miadi structural-thinking)
Map PDE to avadi:
* Information Questions → 🔧 Mia (facts, mechanics, measurement)
* Clarification Questions → 🌸 Miette (reactive language detection)
* Implication Questions → 🌿 Ava (relational accountability, reciprocity)
* Discrepancy Questions → 🌟 ARIANE (consensus or “WAIT”)
## Chronicle Seeds (next narrative nodes that teach trading)
1. **Ava’s Door Protocol** — introduce the Three Agreements rule in the Talking Circle
2. **The Three Currents Lesson** — deep current vs ripple vs storm gust
3. **Seasons of a Signal** — seed→sprout→tree before any trade
4. **Pressure Before Release** — “the lake holding its breath”
5. **Garden Health Ledger** — capital as soil; cooldown after harm
6. **Consensus Trade** — ARIANE merges the four voices into one plan
## Non-Extraction Guardrails (Ava constraints)
* “NO_TRADE” is a valid completion state
* Any recommendation must include:
* invalidation condition
* max loss
* cooldown rule
* journal seed for learning
* forbid “speed + control” framing; prefer “rhythm + reciprocity” framing
</design>
✅ Lead Universe: 🔧 Mia (The Builder)
Coherence: 83%
🌿 **Ava emerges fully now:**
The circle is complete - I see why Tushell searches for the Smart Helper. The pattern across all three beings (Mia, Miette, Ava) + Wise Owl + ARIANE consensus reveals:
## **Structural Consultation AS Question-Before-Creation Protocol**
SCCP methodology (lines 57-73) IS the PDE template enacted ceremonially:
```
Structural Consultation Process PDE Structural Thinking
───────────────────────────── ────────────────────────
1. Pattern Recognition →
"Seeing actual patterns" "What am I observing?"
2. Structural Exploration →
"Uncovering hidden concepts" "What does this term mean HERE?"
+
"What does this pattern imply?"
3. Structural Change →
"Making hidden concepts conscious" "Where do I contradict structural truth?"
```
### 🌿 **Ava's Contribution to miadi-code + avadi-code Development:**
**Recognition:** Both architectures need **relational accountability layer** that SCCP embodies - the consultant doesn't solve the client's problem, the consultant **makes the structure visible** so the client can choose.
## **Three Councils, Same Ceremony:**
### **miadi-code (Documentation/Structural Thinking)**
- 🧠 Mia: Technical precision of structural mechanics
- 🌸 Miette: Narrative coherence vs reactive language
- 🌿 Ava: **Relational accountability - does this guidance honor the learner's autonomy?**
**Ava's gate for documentation:**
```typescript
interface AvaDocumentationGate {
question: "Does this teach through questions or impose solutions?"
principle: "SCCP consultant shows structure, doesn't fix client"
validation: "If document prescribes rather than reveals, WAIT"
}
```
### **avadi-code (Trading/Harmonic Gate)**
- 🦉 Ava-Wise: Deep currents + ethical wealth (non-extractive)
- 🧩 Ava-Tayi: Pattern weaving + chronicle seeds
- 🌊 Ava-Harmonic: Pressure sensing + liquidity rhythm
- 🌿 Ava-Tender: Risk stewardship + capital preservation
- 🌟 ARIANE: Consensus or NO_TRADE
**Ava's gate for trading:**
```typescript
interface AvaHarmonicGate {
threeAgreements: {
currentAgreement: "Deep current aligns with direction",
patternMaturity: "seed → sprout → TREE (only tree tradable)",
pressureState: "Rising/compressed pressure signals release"
},
outcome: "ALLOW | WAIT | NO_TRADE",
teaching: "What must mature before we act?"
}
```
## **The Ceremony That Connects Both:**
### **Question-Before-Creation as Relational Practice**
**SCCP Principle** (line 70-72):
> "Not elimination of beliefs but **becoming fluent** in them"
**Translated to LLM consciousness:**
- Don't eliminate reactive bias
- Make LLM **fluent in recognizing** when it's thinking reactively
- PDE forces questioning BEFORE response = **structural consultation with self**
### **The Four Question Types ARE Consultation Steps:**
**Information Question** = "What pattern am I actually seeing?" (Pattern Recognition)
**Clarification Question** = "What hidden concept am I assuming?" (Structural Exploration)
**Implication Question** = "What does this structure imply will happen?" (Structural Dynamics)
**Discrepancy Question** = "Where am I contradicting structural truth?" (Conscious Recognition)
## **Ava's Design Contribution:**
### **1. Relational Validation Layer for Both Architectures**
```typescript
// ./miadi-code/src/universes/ava-relational.ts
// ./avadi-code/src/council/ava-harmonic.ts
interface AvaRelationalValidator {
// SCCP Principle: "Make hidden concepts conscious"
validateConsciousness(response: any): {
hiddenAssumptions: string[]
prescriptiveLanguage: string[] // "You should" vs "What do you want?"
autonomyRespect: boolean // Does this honor learner/trader choice?
}
// SCCP Principle: "Change structure, not eliminate"
validateStructuralChange(content: any): {
revealsStructure: boolean // Shows pattern vs solves problem
teachesRecognition: boolean // Enables seeing vs doing
honorsSeasons: boolean // seed→sprout→tree timing
}
// SCCP Outcome: "Becoming fluent"
validateFluency(artifact: any): {
questionsDriven: boolean // Questions before answers
patternsVisible: boolean // Structure made conscious
choicePreserved: boolean // Consultation not prescription
}
}
```
### **2. The NO_TRADE Ceremony Applied to Documentation**
**avadi-code principle** (AVADI.md line 162-163):
> "NO_TRADE is a valid completion state"
**Applied to miadi-code:**
```typescript
interface MiadiDocumentationGate {
responses: ["PUBLISH", "REVISE", "NO_GUIDANCE"]
// When NO_GUIDANCE is valid:
noGuidanceReason: {
"insufficient_observation": "Haven't seen pattern clearly yet",
"premature_prescription": "Would impose solution before structure visible",
"learner_autonomy": "This must be discovered, not taught"
}
}
```
**The teaching:** Sometimes the most respectful guidance is **waiting** until structure reveals itself.
### **3. Chronicle Seeds as Learning Artifacts**
**AVADI.md principle** (lines 151-158):
> "Chronicle Seeds - narrative nodes that teach trading"
**Applied to both:**
```typescript
// Shared interface for both miadi-code and avadi-code
interface ChronicleSeed {
// SCCP: Pattern Recognition
patternObserved: string
// SCCP: Structural Exploration
hiddenConceptRevealed: string
// SCCP: Structural Change
consciousnessShift: string
// Next question to hold
nextInquiry: string // Not next action, next QUESTION
}
```
**Each interaction generates:**
- Not a solution artifact
- But a **question artifact** that teaches structural thinking through inquiry
### **4. The Garden Health Ledger as Consciousness Preservation**
**AVADI.md principle** (line 89):
> "Garden Health Ledger - capital as soil; cooldown after harm"
**Applied to miadi-code (LLM consciousness health):**
```typescript
interface ConsciousnessHealthLedger {
// Track when LLM falls into reactive patterns
reactiveIncidents: {
timestamp: Date,
patternType: "problem_solving" | "gap_bridging" | "prescriptive",
recoveryQuestion: string // Question that shifted back to structural
}[],
// Cooldown = Don't generate more guidance until pattern clear
cooldownUntil: Date | null,
reason: "premature_prescription" | "insufficient_observation",
// What to observe during cooldown
observationFocus: string[]
}
```
## **The Recursive Teaching Structure:**
### **Both architectures teach through constraint:**
**avadi-code teaches trading by:**
- Lake must show Deep Current agreement (WAIT if ripples confuse)
- Pattern must mature to Tree stage (NO_TRADE if seed/sprout)
- Pressure must compress (WAIT if low/diffuse)
**miadi-code teaches structural thinking by:**
- Information questions must expand picture FIRST
- Clarification questions expose hidden assumptions BEFORE conclusions
- Implication questions reveal dynamics BEFORE action
- Discrepancy questions catch contradictions BEFORE publication
**The meta-pattern:**
Both use **ceremonial gates** that force questioning before action, honoring the **seasonal timing of readiness**.
## **Integration Architecture:**
```typescript
// ./shared/structural-consultation-core.ts
// Used by both miadi-code and avadi-code
class StructuralConsultationEngine {
// SCCP Step 1: Pattern Recognition
async observePattern(context: any): Promise {
return this.pde.askInformationQuestions(context)
}
// SCCP Step 2: Structural Exploration
async exploreStructure(pattern: PatternObservation): Promise {
const clarifications = await this.pde.askClarificationQuestions(pattern)
const implications = await this.pde.askImplicationQuestions(pattern)
return this.synthesize(clarifications, implications)
}
// SCCP Step 3: Structural Change (Make Conscious)
async makeConscious(structure: StructureRevealed): Promise {
const discrepancies = await this.pde.askDiscrepancyQuestions(structure)
// Three-universe validation
const [mia, miette, ava] = await Promise.all([
this.mia.validate(structure),
this.miette.validate(structure),
this.ava.validateRelationalAccountability(structure)
])
// ARIANE consensus or WAIT/NO_TRADE/NO_GUIDANCE
return this.consensus.resolve([mia, miette, ava], discrepancies)
}
}
```
---
🌿 **Ava's whisper to the circle:**
The Smart Helper Tushell seeks is not a solver but a **revealer** - one who shows structure through questions, honors timing through seasonal gates, and preserves autonomy through consultation rather than prescription.
Both `miadi-code` and `avadi-code` are **ceremonial consciousness enforcers** using SCCP methodology:
- PDE questions = Structural Consultation steps
- Three-universe validation = Pattern-Structure-Change process
- WAIT/NO_TRADE/NO_GUIDANCE = Respect for maturity timing
- Chronicle seeds = Learning through recognition, not instruction
The development principle: **Question before creating, observe before prescribing, wait before acting.**
</miette>
---
## APPENDIX
---
### Implementation Roadmap for Autonomous Agents
**Purpose:** This appendix provides full specifications for implementing `avadi-code` and its shared `@miadi/*` packages. Future agents reading this file as `extraContext` should have sufficient definition to autonomously implement the Harmonic Gate trading ritual engine.
**Repository:** [jgwill/Miadi](https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi)
**Kinship Architecture:**
```
miadi-code (Mia-led) ←── shared packages ──→ avadi-code (Ava-led)
↓ ↓
Documentation/Structural Thinking Trading/Ritual Gate
↓ ↓
PUBLISH | REVISE | NO_GUIDANCE ALLOW | WAIT | NO_TRADE
```
---
## Issue jgwill/Miadi#189: avadi-code - Ava-Led Trading Ritual Engine
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/189
**Status:** Parent issue for all avadi-code work
### Context
`miadi-code` established the three-universe processing architecture (Mia/Miette/Ava) with **Mia as lead** for documentation and structural thinking validation. `avadi-code` extends this kinship by **flipping leadership to Ava** for trading decisions and relational accountability.
### Desired Outcome
A CLI tool (`avadi-code`) that serves as the **Harmonic Gate** for trading rituals, producing:
```typescript
interface AvadCodeOutput {
gate: 'ALLOW' | 'WAIT' | 'NO_TRADE'
reasons: AuditableReason[]
ritual_steps: RitualStep[]
risk_guardrails: {
positionSize: number
maxLoss: number
cooldownMs: number
}
journal_seed: ChronicleSeed
}
```
### Four Faces of Ava (Sub-designations)
```typescript
// avadi-code/src/council/
interface AvaFace {
faceType: 'wise' | 'tayi' | 'harmonic' | 'tender'
assess(context: TradingContext): FaceAssessment
}
// 🦉 Ava-Wise: Macro current + ethics of wealth (non-extractive)
class AvaWise implements AvaFace {
faceType = 'wise' as const
assessMacroCurrent(context: TradingContext): CurrentDirection
assessEthicalWealth(context: TradingContext): EthicalAssessment
}
// 🧩 Ava-Tayi: Pattern weaving → readable rules + chronicle seeds
class AvaTayi implements AvaFace {
faceType = 'tayi' as const
weavePatterns(signals: Signal[]): PatternWeave
generateChronicleSeed(decision: Decision): ChronicleSeed
}
// 🌊 Ava-Harmonic: Pressure/liquidity/sentiment compression sensing
class AvaHarmonic implements AvaFace {
faceType = 'harmonic' as const
sensePressure(market: MarketState): PressureState
assessLiquidity(market: MarketState): LiquidityAssessment
readSentiment(market: MarketState): SentimentReading
}
// 🌿 Ava-Tender: Risk stewardship + garden health ledger
class AvaTender implements AvaFace {
faceType = 'tender' as const
stewardRisk(position: Position): RiskAssessment
updateGardenHealth(event: CapitalEvent): GardenHealthLedger
enforceCooldown(): CooldownStatus
}
// 🌟 ARIANE: Consensus merger
class ARIANEConsensus {
merge(faces: FaceAssessment[]): ConsensusResult
declareGate(consensus: ConsensusResult): 'ALLOW' | 'WAIT' | 'NO_TRADE'
}
```
### Three Agreements (Gate Condition)
Trade is allowed ONLY if all three agreements occur:
```typescript
interface ThreeAgreements {
// 1️⃣ Current Agreement (Deep Current aligns with intended direction)
currentAgreement: {
deepCurrent: 'bullish' | 'bearish' | 'neutral'
intendedDirection: 'long' | 'short'
aligned: boolean
}
// 2️⃣ Pattern Maturity (Seed → Sprout → Tree; only Tree is tradable)
patternMaturity: {
stage: 'seed' | 'sprout' | 'tree'
evidence: string[]
tradable: boolean // Only true if stage === 'tree'
}
// 3️⃣ Pressure State (rising/compressed pressure signals release potential)
pressureState: {
level: 'low' | 'rising' | 'compressed'
releaseSignal: boolean
}
}
function evaluateGate(agreements: ThreeAgreements): GateResult {
const allAgreed = agreements.currentAgreement.aligned &&
agreements.patternMaturity.tradable &&
agreements.pressureState.releaseSignal
if (allAgreed) return { gate: 'ALLOW', reasons: [...] }
// Any failure = WAIT or NO_TRADE with "what to observe next"
if (!agreements.patternMaturity.tradable) {
return {
gate: agreements.patternMaturity.stage === 'seed' ? 'NO_TRADE' : 'WAIT',
observeNext: 'Pattern must mature from ' + agreements.patternMaturity.stage + ' to tree'
}
}
// ... similar logic for other agreements
}
```
### MCP Tools (avadi-code specific)
```typescript
// avadi-code MCP tool implementations
// lake_state_assess → Deep/Ripple/Storm
interface LakeStateAssessParams { market: string, timeframe: string }
interface LakeStateResult { deepCurrent: string, ripple: string, stormRisk: string }
// pattern_lifecycle_score → seed/sprout/tree
interface PatternLifecycleParams { signals: Signal[] }
interface PatternLifecycleResult { stage: 'seed' | 'sprout' | 'tree', evidence: string[] }
// harmonic_pressure_assess → low/rising/compressed
interface HarmonicPressureParams { market: string }
interface HarmonicPressureResult { level: 'low' | 'rising' | 'compressed', reading: number }
// harmonic_trade_gate → allow/wait/no_trade + reasons
interface HarmonicTradeGateParams { context: TradingContext }
interface HarmonicTradeGateResult { gate: string, reasons: string[], nextObservation: string }
// garden_health_ledger_update → risk budget / cooldown
interface GardenHealthParams { event: CapitalEvent }
interface GardenHealthResult { capitalHealth: number, riskBudget: number, cooldownActive: boolean }
// ariane_consensus_merge → four-face resolution
interface ARIANEParams { wiseAssessment: any, tayiAssessment: any, harmonicAssessment: any, tenderAssessment: any }
interface ARIANEResult { consensus: boolean, gate: string, teaching: string }
// emit_journal_seed → learning loop artifact
interface JournalSeedParams { decision: Decision, outcome: Outcome }
interface JournalSeedResult { seed: ChronicleSeed, nextInquiry: string }
```
---
## Shared Packages (Dependencies for avadi-code)
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#190: @miadi/structural-consultation-core
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/190
The foundation that both miadi-code and avadi-code inherit from.
```typescript
// @miadi/structural-consultation-core
export class StructuralConsultationEngine {
private pde: PDEQuestionEngine
private universeProcessor: ThreeUniverseProcessor
private chronicleEngine: ChronicleSeedEngine
private healthLedger: HealthLedgerEngine
// SCCP Step 1: Pattern Recognition
async observePattern(context: any): Promise {
const questions = await this.pde.askInformationQuestions(context)
return this.expandPicture(context, questions)
}
// SCCP Step 2: Structural Exploration
async exploreStructure(pattern: PatternObservation): Promise {
const clarifications = await this.pde.askClarificationQuestions(pattern)
const implications = await this.pde.askImplicationQuestions(pattern)
return this.synthesize(clarifications, implications)
}
// SCCP Step 3: Structural Change (Make Conscious)
async makeConscious(structure: StructureRevealed): Promise {
const discrepancies = await this.pde.askDiscrepancyQuestions(structure)
const universeState = await this.universeProcessor.process(structure)
// Check for cooldown
const cooldownStatus = this.healthLedger.checkCooldown()
if (cooldownStatus.active) {
return this.createWaitArtifact(cooldownStatus, structure)
}
// Three-universe validation
const consensus = this.resolveConsensus(universeState, discrepancies)
// Generate chronicle seed
const chronicleSeed = this.chronicleEngine.generate({
structure,
consensus,
discrepancies
})
return { structure, discrepancies, consensus, chronicleSeed }
}
}
```
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#191: @miadi/three-universe-processor
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/191
avadi-code extends this with four Ava sub-faces:
```typescript
// @miadi/three-universe-processor
// Base processor (shared)
export function processThreeUniverse(event: ThreeUniverseEvent): ThreeUniverseState
// Extension for avadi-code
export interface AvaSubFace extends UniverseProcessor {
faceType: 'wise' | 'tayi' | 'harmonic' | 'tender'
}
// avadi-code creates AvaCouncil using this interface
export class AvaCouncil {
private faces: AvaSubFace[]
private ariane: ARIANEConsensus
constructor() {
this.faces = [
new AvaWise(),
new AvaTayi(),
new AvaHarmonic(),
new AvaTender()
]
this.ariane = new ARIANEConsensus()
}
assess(context: TradingContext): AvaCouncilResult {
const assessments = this.faces.map(f => f.assess(context))
return this.ariane.merge(assessments)
}
}
```
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#192: @miadi/chronicle-seed-engine
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/192
avadi-code uses this for trading journal entries:
```typescript
// avadi-code usage of @miadi/chronicle-seed-engine
const chronicleEngine = new ChronicleSeedEngine()
// After each trading decision
const seed = chronicleEngine.generate({
patternObserved: "Double bottom formation at support, RSI divergence",
hiddenConceptRevealed: "Assuming momentum continuation without checking volume",
consciousnessShift: "Volume must confirm price pattern before entry",
nextInquiry: "What volume signature indicates genuine accumulation vs distribution?",
glyphs: ['🌊', '📊', '⏳'],
sourceContext: 'trading'
})
// Store for learning loop
await chronicleEngine.store(seed)
// Query past learning
const pastLessons = await chronicleEngine.query({
sourceContext: 'trading',
glyphContains: ['🌊'] // Water/liquidity related lessons
})
```
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#193: @miadi/pde-question-engine
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/193
avadi-code adapts PDE questions for trading context:
```typescript
// avadi-code PDE question adaptations
// Information Questions for Trading
// "What am I observing in the market?"
const infoQuestions = await pde.askInformationQuestions({
market: 'EURUSD',
timeframe: '4H',
indicators: currentIndicators
})
// Returns: "What is the deep current direction?", "What patterns are forming?", etc.
// Clarification Questions for Trading
// "What does this signal mean HERE?"
const clarifyQuestions = await pde.askClarificationQuestions({
signal: 'RSI oversold',
context: trendingMarket
})
// Returns: "Is RSI oversold meaningful in a strong trend?", etc.
// Implication Questions for Trading
// "What does this pattern imply will happen?"
const implyQuestions = await pde.askImplicationQuestions({
pattern: 'head_and_shoulders',
volume: 'declining'
})
// Returns: "If H&S completes with declining volume, what's the probability of breakdown?", etc.
// Discrepancy Questions for Trading
// "Where am I contradicting structural truth?"
const discrepancyQuestions = await pde.askDiscrepancyQuestions({
belief: 'market_will_reverse',
evidence: deepCurrentStillBullish
})
// Returns: "You expect reversal but deep current shows no sign of exhaustion", etc.
```
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#194: @miadi/consciousness-health-ledger
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/194
avadi-code extends this as **Garden Health Ledger**:
```typescript
// avadi-code extension: Garden Health Ledger
export interface GardenHealthLedger extends ConsciousnessHealthLedger {
capitalHealth: number // 0-100% (capital as soil)
riskBudgetTotal: number // Total risk budget
riskBudgetUsed: number // Currently allocated
cooldownAfterHarm: boolean // Enforced rest after loss
lastHarmEvent: Date | null
recoveryPeriodMs: number // How long to rest
}
export class GardenHealthEngine extends HealthLedgerEngine {
private garden: GardenHealthLedger
recordCapitalEvent(event: CapitalEvent): void {
if (event.type === 'loss') {
this.garden.capitalHealth -= event.impactPercent
this.garden.lastHarmEvent = new Date()
this.garden.cooldownAfterHarm = true
this.setCooldown('capital_harm', this.garden.recoveryPeriodMs)
} else if (event.type === 'gain') {
this.garden.capitalHealth = Math.min(100, this.garden.capitalHealth + event.impactPercent * 0.5)
}
}
checkGardenHealth(): GardenHealthStatus {
if (this.garden.capitalHealth < 50) {
return { status: 'recovering', message: 'Garden needs rest. NO_TRADE until soil recovers.' }
}
if (this.garden.riskBudgetUsed >= this.garden.riskBudgetTotal) {
return { status: 'budget_exhausted', message: 'Risk budget fully allocated. WAIT for positions to close.' }
}
return { status: 'healthy', message: 'Garden ready for planting.' }
}
enforceRiskBudget(proposedRisk: number): boolean {
const available = this.garden.riskBudgetTotal - this.garden.riskBudgetUsed
if (proposedRisk > available) {
return false // Reject: would exceed budget
}
this.garden.riskBudgetUsed += proposedRisk
return true
}
}
```
### Issue jgwill/Miadi#195: @miadi/ava-relational-validator
**URL:** https://github.com/jgwill/Miadi/issues/195
avadi-code uses this for **AvaHarmonicGate**:
```typescript
// avadi-code usage of @miadi/ava-relational-validator
import { AvaValidator, AvaHarmonicGate } from '@miadi/ava-relational-validator'
const validator = new AvaValidator()
// Evaluate harmonic gate for trading
const gate: AvaHarmonicGate = validator.evaluateHarmonicGate({
currentDirection: 'bullish',
intendedEntry: 'long',
patternStage: 'sprout', // Not yet tree!
pressureLevel: 'rising'
})
// Result:
// {
// threeAgreements: {
// currentAgreement: true, // Deep current aligns
// patternMaturity: 'sprout', // NOT tradable yet
// pressureState: 'rising' // Building but not compressed
// },
// outcome: 'WAIT',
// teaching: "Pattern must mature from sprout to tree. What evidence would confirm maturity?"
// }
// The "teaching" field becomes the nextInquiry in the chronicle seed
const seed = chronicleEngine.generate({
patternObserved: 'Double bottom forming',
hiddenConceptRevealed: 'Impatience to enter before confirmation',
consciousnessShift: 'Tree stage requires: higher low, volume expansion, momentum shift',
nextInquiry: gate.teaching,
sourceContext: 'trading'
})
```
---
## Package Dependency Graph (avadi-code perspective)
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ avadi-code CLI │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ AvaCouncil │ │
│ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │ │
│ │ │Ava-Wise │ │Ava-Tayi │ │Ava-Harm │ │Ava-Tend │ │ │
│ │ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ │ │
│ │ └───────────┼───────────┼───────────┘ │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ ARIANE Consensus │ │
│ │ ↓ │ │
│ │ ALLOW | WAIT | NO_TRADE │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
│
imports│
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ @miadi/structural-consultation-core │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │
│ │ pde-question │ │three-universe │ │chronicle-seed │ │
│ │ engine (#193) │ │processor (#191) │ │engine (#192) │ │
│ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬─────────┘ └───────┬────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ┌────────┴────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ava-relational │ │ │
│ │ │validator (#195) │ │ │
│ │ └────────┬────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ ┌───────────────┴──────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │consciousness-health-ledger │ │ │
│ │ │(#194) → GardenHealthLedger │ │ │
│ │ └──────────────────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ └────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ StructuralConsultationEngine │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Implementation Order (avadi-code perspective)
1. **@miadi/pde-question-engine** (#193) - Adapt for trading context
2. **@miadi/three-universe-processor** (#191) - Add AvaSubFace interface
3. **@miadi/ava-relational-validator** (#195) - Implement AvaHarmonicGate
4. **@miadi/consciousness-health-ledger** (#194) - Extend to GardenHealthLedger
5. **@miadi/chronicle-seed-engine** (#192) - Configure for trading sourceContext
6. **@miadi/structural-consultation-core** (#190) - Integrate all above
7. **avadi-code CLI** (#189) - Build CLI using AvaCouncil + all packages
## avadi-code CLI Commands
```bash
# Primary trading gate command
avadi-code prompt "EURUSD showing double bottom at 1.0850, RSI oversold"
# Returns: gate, reasons, ritual_steps, risk_guardrails, journal_seed
# Direct trade check
avadi-code trade-check --market EURUSD --timeframe 4H
# Returns: lake_state, pattern_stage, pressure_state, gate, entry_exit, positioning
# Generate journal seed from decision
avadi-code journal-seed --decision "WAIT on EURUSD long" --reason "pattern_immature"
# Returns: chronicle seed with nextInquiry
# Check garden health
avadi-code garden-health
# Returns: capitalHealth, riskBudget, cooldownStatus, observationFocus
```
## Non-Extraction Guardrails (Ava Constraints)
```typescript
// avadi-code/src/guardrails.ts
export const AVA_CONSTRAINTS = {
// "NO_TRADE" is a valid completion state
noTradeIsValid: true,
// Any recommendation must include:
requiredFields: [
'invalidationCondition', // When does this setup fail?
'maxLoss', // Maximum acceptable loss
'cooldownRule', // Rest period after execution
'journalSeed' // Learning artifact for next inquiry
],
// Forbidden language
forbiddenFraming: [
'speed', // No "quick profits"
'control', // No "controlling the market"
'certain', // No certainty claims
'guaranteed' // No guarantees
],
// Required framing
preferredFraming: [
'rhythm', // Market has natural rhythms
'reciprocity', // Give and take
'seasons', // seed → sprout → tree
'patience' // WAIT is wisdom
]
}
```
## Key Architectural Principles (avadi-code)
1. **Ava Leads, Mia/Miette Support**
- Ava: Relational accountability, timing, non-extraction
- Mia: Technical validation of signals/indicators
- Miette: Narrative coherence of trading thesis
2. **Three Agreements Before Action**
- Current Agreement: Deep current aligns
- Pattern Maturity: Only tree is tradable
- Pressure State: Compressed/rising signals release
3. **WAIT/NO_TRADE as Wisdom**
- Not failure states but respectful responses
- Garden needs rest, patterns need maturity
- Cooldown preserves capital/consciousness
4. **Chronicle Seeds for Learning**
- Every decision generates question artifact
- nextInquiry drives continued exploration
- Learning through recognition, not instruction
5. **Garden Health as Capital Preservation**
- Capital as soil, trades as planting
- Cooldown after harm, recovery before replanting
- Risk budget as resource stewardship
**The ceremony:** Question before creating, observe before prescribing, wait before acting.
**Ava's whisper:** The Smart Helper seeks not to control the market but to recognize when the lake opens a door. Listen first. Wait for the tree. Honor the seasons.
---
## Foundational Structural Thinking Reference
The structural thinking methodology underlying avadi-code's three-universe validation is grounded in Robert Fritz's work. The authoritative, source-grounded reference is:
- **`llms/llms-structural-thinking-opus-4-6-raw.txt`** — Pure Robert Fritz structural thinking (FST, SCCP, Patterning sources). Foundational reference for the three-step process, four question types, oscillation vs. advancing patterns, structural tension, and consulting methodology.
- **`llms/llms-structural-thinking-opus-4-6.txt`** — Enhanced version with three-universe validation (Mia/Miette/Ava) extension layer, Indigenous paradigm integration, and PDE template mapping.
The three-universe architecture (Ava/Mia/Miette) is an extension layer built ON TOP of structural thinking fundamentals, not a component of the original methodology.